Recently I had the opportunity to view the range of taxi despatch (or dispatch if you prefer) & booking software that taxi companies use to book in jobs from the telephone and send the job out to the driver.

Which software products being reviewed

Disclaimer

I used to work in the taxi industry as the technical director at a 180 car company which I no longer work at. I personally shopped around to see what other products were on the market and then fed this information back to the board. I can now release my personal opinions on here and are not those views of my former employer. (Really really!!)

Prices

Obviously to maintain commercial sensitivity with the prices quoted I’ll refer in “beans”
Cabmaster – 1 bean
Mercury – 1¼ beans
Autocab – 1½ beans
Cordic – 3 beans

Size of Company

This is perceived size, I don’t have accurate data
Cabmaster – 6
Mercury – 30
Cordic – 50
GPC – 200

Quality of Sales Rep

(I used to be a medical sales, so have been trained in classical needs based, LSCPA sales)
Cabmaster – Non existent.
Mercury – Very impressed, relaxed, confident, let’s product do most of talking.
Autocab – Sales Sales Sales. But yet subtle. Took me down to Data Cars in Birmingham to see operation.
Cordic – Arrogant, actively avoided talking price. Arranged for me to visit A1 Radio cars. Do bring along a very impressive presentation though, with the software run from a laptop. (Impressive use of system resources)

With both Autocab and Cordic the visits arranged were primarily cash based businesses which did not really meet the account work volume that Millers Taxis have, therefore it was not representative. Mercury did try and match like for like, and to an extent did show similar account work volumes.

This is very important for any taxi company as cash work is very easy to input. ie “34 Smith st TAB 12 ashbourne crescent END” (example) with the majority of the bookings for NOW. Booking in account work takes slightly longer and more care is needed.

Technical Quality of Software

Autocab despite it’s sales material DOES use a client server model, with the dispatchers machine acting as the server. Autocab uses an embedded MySQL server, with distributed backup. There is still a single point of failure, however with hard drives set up in a RAID configuration and database cloning this is greatly reduced. The programme itself is installed on Shuttle micro ITX computers running WindowsXP, on boot the programme auto loads and prompts for a “function” ie Dispatcher. PDA software is difficult to use but does have redundancy (grr) built in.

Cordic uses Microsoft 2003 SQL server. Is REALLY quick. (no … really really quick). The link between the modules is very well set out which allows for quick input.

Cabmaster uses static database files (.btr) using the BTrieve (Pervasive SQL), with the files shared over Windows File Sharing (SMB) which is from the dark ages of computing. This in my eyes is one of cabmaster’s biggest failings, any hard drive corruption or write error can seriously damage the files leading to jobs being lost. To my knowledge there have been 2 occasions where the database needed to be “re-built” to my knowledge. (prior to me starting). Command Software should set up a RAID configuration on the MAIN server. Also there are THREE machines that in the standard configuration that act as servers MAIN, BACKUP, HOST which are each a point of failure.

Cabmaster has some very good features but is very buggy. There is no version control in their development which means if you want a bug fix you get the latest version which could have other bugs. Cabmaster has the BEST XDA software on the market.. by far… very easy to use! No question! Lessons need to be learned from the others!

Overall

Autocab is by far the biggest company in the taxi dispatch software market, but has not delivered a product which takes the needs of a live taxi business into account, and are very much “Do it this way”. Stable, but only at the expensive of office productivity, ie can only use the computer for autocab, not email, not yellow pages etc.

Cabmaster, is actually a really good product, however they are let down by a lack of online booking system that integrates into the product. I re-wrote parts of Millers’ online booking website to link to Cabmaster it was put together many years ago in ASP and is vulnerable to SQL injection and needs re-writing with security being it’s focus. I did make a start on a AJAX PHP online booking website that used a MySQL address database which would then insert the job into the live database, but hey he ho.. Millers didn’t see the value in this. (If any company would be interested in this. Get in touch!)

Mercury is a lovely product, well put together and my favourite. My only real concern with it was the holding off for “Mercury 2″ which by all accounts has been work in progress for many years. Needs a “What’s happening now” panel and improvements to their XDA software.

Ratings

AutoCab 4/10 – Lagging behind on some of the high value technical features of their competitors. Good if not used a booking system before.

Cordic 9/10 – The doggy-do-dahs of the taxi booking software but is CRAZILY priced!!!

Cabmaster 7/10 – Well layed out, easy to use, but does not have a good training manual or training structure. I would have liked to stay with Cabmaster

Mercury 8/10 – Very good product…. in the second stage sales presentation the National Sales manager let the sale go by talking about irrelevant things.

Recommendation – Cabmaster if they sort out the buggy nature of their product as it is very feature rich. If you want better training and setup support go with Mercury.

UPDATE: Following the fantastic response this post has received from people searching for taxi booking software. I will be offering my impartial services to assist established and startup private hire companies, both for the booking software and for telephone systems and services that can help in the integration with the software.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. Version Control Systems – SVN Mercurial GIT Bazaar Review of Version Control Systems for Linux & Windows This...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , ,

  • Jason
    Any Reviews on Taxi mate, (softsol software). I'm currently looking for a new despatch system.
    We are a chauffeur company using a (DBS) despatch system but they when belly up in late 2008 and i had to by my data back from the liquidators, I don't whant to be in cought like that again.
    regards. jason
  • I agree with Sonia I run a PC Repair comapany and one of my customers users Mercury. There comapny harddisk is failing so I will need to replace the harddisk and re-install Mercury desktop software. So I phoned Mercury to ask if they had an installation CD and install guide but was met by a very blunt support rep who said no and they would have to take the whole PC up to them just to install the software! Maybe this company has a niche in the market but it wont be for long and as soon as any other company launches similar software with minimal customer service skills I would reccomend you dont touch Mercury with a barge pole.
  • Sonia
    We have been ween Mercury for nearly 15 months...We are a fleet of nearly 80 vehicles, established for 15years

    Their direct talking sales rep expects you to attend a training course in Nottingham to train you on the system.

    2 weeks after attending they visited our offices, configured the software and left us to it.

    We were expected to set up our drivers, plots (draw lines across a map to seperate them into plots) and prices. At training they make several claims, the most common being we will support you however their communication is extremely poor. You call back again, again and again and finally when you are close to bursting point they help you out.

    I cannot understand why they literally make you have an extra screen, they claim its to use a MAP and see all your drivers but you cannot see what road your driver is on unless you zoom in so its a total waste of money.

    We had a few teething problems at the start, the software was at fault, they took a long time to resolve it. When we called their 24 hour emergency service with one controller in our office at 3am, whilst he was speaking to them, our company phone rang so he answered to take the job, the mercury rep on the other line told him "you have to speak to me if you phone me otherwise I will not help you".

    To summarise, the software is simple and straight forward but so is Cordics, Cab Master, Marandy and Autocab. Their communication across the board is very poor and their customer service staff are very rude. I have never experienced such poor customer service, Macdonalds have alot to teach them.

    Why they expect you to pay them money for their software and then want you to set everything up is totally beyond me. They all have very rehearsed excuses i.e. we want you to be in control, in other words if anything goes wrong you cannot blame us as opposed to why don't we do it together and help you because this is our business and we want you to get the most out of it..

    We have not renewed our contract for obvisious reasons - hope this helps someone as I was looking for several reviews prior to contacting Mercury and found none. Be warned their sales rep will come round and tell you how so and so are doing brilliant thanks to them..
  • Mark Goldberg
    Great article, can you tell me the best products for use in the United Sates?
  • Tony
    I've been constructing a custom reporting tool for the company I work for, for use with Autocab.

    I've found Autocab does not use MySQL to store its job information. It uses custom fixed-width hex files to store job data, user messages, driver message etc. It does however use MySQL for the IVR function, or rather the IVR system Autocab uses utilises MySQL. SQLite is used for the mapping functions.

    Word on the grapevine is Autocab's next major version(Autocab.NET)a will fully utilise a MySQL backend to store all its data.
  • Tony
    So I've been tinkering with Autocab for a while now found out the following information.

    Current Autocab versions do not use MySQL to store job information, it uses a custom fixed-width hex format and separate files to store different job types as well as user messages, driver messages etc. It does however use MySQL for its IVR system, or rather the IVR system Autocab integrates with uses MySQL. SQLite is used in the mapping functions.

    I've been making a custom reporting tool for the company I work for for use with Autocab and this is how I came about the above.

    Word on the grapevine is Autocab's next major version (Autocab.net) will be fully utilising a MySQL backend to store all its data.
blog comments powered by Disqus